Interleukin-10 Promoter Polymorphisms and Susceptibility to Skin Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Renal Transplantation

After organ transplantation, susceptibility to cancer is multifactorial, especially for skin carcinomas. Risk factors may include genetic susceptibilities, such as the control of cytokine production. Interleukin-10 is a cytokine that is implicated in tumorigenesis, and it has been shown that polymorphisms in its gene promoter correlate with differential amounts of production. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible association between interleukin-10 gene promoter polymorphisms and the occurrence of skin carcinomas after renal transplantation. Seventy kidney transplant recipients who developed a squamous cell carcinoma or a basal cell carcinoma were examined for polymorphisms in the interleukin-10 gene promoter using polymerase chain reaction based methods. Single base pair mutations were studied at positions –1082, –819, and –592. These patients were compared to 70 healthy controls and to 70 matched renal transplant recipients without cancer. The interleukin-10 secretion capability was tested in a subgroup of 40 of these patients by in vitro stimulation of peripheral mononuclear cells. Interleukin-10 genotypes and haplotypes were differently distributed in kidney transplant recipients who developed a skin carcinoma, but especially a squamous cell carcinoma, with an increased frequency of the GCC haplotype and a decreased frequency of the ATA haplotype. Subsequently, we found a shift in the predicted phenotypes from the low production phenotype to the high production phenotype. Secretion of interleukin-10 was strongly correlated to the production predicted phenotype, and tended to be higher in patients who developed a squamous cell carcinoma than in the others. These results indicate that interleukin-10 gene polymorphisms and interleukin-10 production capability may contribute to the development of skin squamous cell carcinomas after renal transplantation

Assessing renal graft function in clinical trials: Can tests predicting glomerular filtration rate substitute for a reference method?

Assessing renal graft function in clinical trials: Can tests predicting glomerular filtration rate substitute for a reference method?BackgroundIn clinical trials, comparison of renal graft function needs a rigorous determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Since reference methods to measure GFR cannot be easily implemented, a number of tests predicting GFR are usually used. However, little is known about their validity in renal transplant patients. We aimed to compare the performances of six GFR tests with inulin clearance in this population.MethodsFive hundred consecutive inulin clearances performed in 294 renal transplant recipients with stable renal function were retrospectively selected. For each of them, we computed six estimates: the 24-hour creatinine clearance, the Cockcroft-Gault, Walser, Jelliffe, Nankivell, and Levey formulas. Their respective performance was assessed by correlation (simple linear regression), accuracy (dispersion of true error), and agreement (Bland and Altman method).ResultsEach GFR test closely correlated with inulin clearance (P < 0.0001). Comparisons between pairs of GFR tests did not show any significant difference in accuracy between the Levey, Jelliffe, and Walser formulas. Conversely, each of these formulas demonstrated a significant lower dispersion (P < 0.005) than the others. Nevertheless, all GFR tests displayed considerable lack of agreement with limits of agreement over 40mL/min/1.73m2 apart. The proportion of predicted GFR differing from inulin clearance by ± 10mL/min/1.73m2, ranged from 34% for the Jelliffe formula to 53% for the Nankivell's one.ConclusionNone of these formulas seems to be able to safely substitute for inulin clearance. In clinical trials, renal graft function should be preferably assessed using a reference method of GFR measurement

Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention Groups

Background: Canagliflozin reduces the risk of kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, but effects on specific cardiovascular outcomes are uncertain, as are effects in people without previous cardiovascular disease (primary prevention). Methods: In CREDENCE (Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes With Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation), 4401 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease were randomly assigned to canagliflozin or placebo on a background of optimized standard of care. Results: Primary prevention participants (n=2181, 49.6%) were younger (61 versus 65 years), were more often female (37% versus 31%), and had shorter duration of diabetes mellitus (15 years versus 16 years) compared with secondary prevention participants (n=2220, 50.4%). Canagliflozin reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events overall (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; P=0.01), with consistent reductions in both the primary (HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.49-0.94]) and secondary (HR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.06]) prevention groups (P for interaction=0.25). Effects were also similar for the components of the composite including cardiovascular death (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.61-1.00]), nonfatal myocardial infarction (HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.59-1.10]), and nonfatal stroke (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.56-1.15]). The risk of the primary composite renal outcome and the composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure were also consistently reduced in both the primary and secondary prevention groups (P for interaction &gt;0.5 for each outcome). Conclusions: Canagliflozin significantly reduced major cardiovascular events and kidney failure in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease, including in participants who did not have previous cardiovascular disease

Canagliflozin and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes and nephropathy

BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes mellitus is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide, but few effective long-term treatments are available. In cardiovascular trials of inhibitors of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), exploratory results have suggested that such drugs may improve renal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS In this double-blind, randomized trial, we assigned patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuric chronic kidney disease to receive canagliflozin, an oral SGLT2 inhibitor, at a dose of 100 mg daily or placebo. All the patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 30 to &lt;90 ml per minute per 1.73 m2 of body-surface area and albuminuria (ratio of albumin [mg] to creatinine [g], &gt;300 to 5000) and were treated with renin–angiotensin system blockade. The primary outcome was a composite of end-stage kidney disease (dialysis, transplantation, or a sustained estimated GFR of &lt;15 ml per minute per 1.73 m2), a doubling of the serum creatinine level, or death from renal or cardiovascular causes. Prespecified secondary outcomes were tested hierarchically. RESULTS The trial was stopped early after a planned interim analysis on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee. At that time, 4401 patients had undergone randomization, with a median follow-up of 2.62 years. The relative risk of the primary outcome was 30% lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group, with event rates of 43.2 and 61.2 per 1000 patient-years, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.59 to 0.82; P=0.00001). The relative risk of the renal-specific composite of end-stage kidney disease, a doubling of the creatinine level, or death from renal causes was lower by 34% (hazard ratio, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81; P&lt;0.001), and the relative risk of end-stage kidney disease was lower by 32% (hazard ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.54 to 0.86; P=0.002). The canagliflozin group also had a lower risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80; P&lt;0.001). There were no significant differences in rates of amputation or fracture. CONCLUSIONS In patients with type 2 diabetes and kidney disease, the risk of kidney failure and cardiovascular events was lower in the canagliflozin group than in the placebo group at a median follow-up of 2.62 years

Spectrum of ANCA-Associated Disorders According to Serological Phenotype in Routine Care: Retrospective Case Series of 209 Patients

Objective: To summarize the experience of three years of positive ANCA (anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies) testing in a single university based hospital. We describe the clinical features according to ANCA phenotype of patients who did and did not have ANCA- associated vasculitis (AAV).Methods: We did a review of all samples tested for ANCA in a 3 year-period (2005-2007). Each sample was tested by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) and enzyme-linked-immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Sera were considered as positive for ANCA testing if either IIF or ELISA for MPO or PR3 antigen specificity was positive. Patients were considered as having AAV on established diagnostic criteria and algorithms.Results: The positive ANCA population consisted in 209 patients, 54 were classified in the AAV group and 155 patients constituted the “Others†group. The typically most relevant ANCA phenotypes (C-ANCA/anti-PR3+ and P-ANCA/anti-MPO+) were detected in 90 % (49/54) of patients in the AAV group and only 10% (15/155) of the “Others†group (p &lt; 0.001). Among the latter none developed AAV during follow-up. Positive IIF alone was found in 4% (2/54) of the AAV group and in 68% (105/155) of the “Others†group (p &lt; 0.001). In patients without AAV, positive IIF alone or positive ELISA with negative IIF represented the main ANCA pattern.Conclusion: In routine clinical practice, most patients with positive ANCA testing do not have AAV. The typical ANCA pattern (C-ANCA/anti-PR3+ or P-ANCA/anti-MPO+) remains a strong predictor of AAV in patients with a high level of suspicion for systemic vasculitis. In other cases, ANCA positivity should be interpreted with extreme caution

Quantification of Circulating Regulatory T Cells by Flow Cytometry in Kidney Transplant Patients After Basiliximab Induction Therapy

International audiencePas de résum